Nigerians reacted on Wednesday to a report alleging that President
Goodluck Jonathan accused the citizens of encouraging corruption in the
country.
While declaring open the 54th annual conference of the Nigerian
Economic Society in Abuja on Tuesday, the President had reportedly said
that if Nigerians did not “reward corrupt practices” through their
actions, those involved would have no need to continue.
Responding to the statement on the social media, many Nigerians
applauded Jonathan’s position and then, cautioned him against putting
the blame for corruption entirely on them.
The respondents said the President, through his inability to lead by
example, had failed to provide a lasting solution to corruption.
Some of those who disapproved of Jonathan’s statement said he goofed by casting the first stone.
They went on to accuse him of promoting corruption by granting state
pardon to a former Governor of Bayelsa State, Diepreye Alamieyeseigha,
who had been convicted on charges of corruption.
A respondent on punchng.com, Yemy, said Jonathan had demonstrated his
tacit support for corrupt Nigerians by granting pardon to
Alamieyeseigha.
The reader said, “No doubt that President Goodluck Jonathan is spot
on. However, he who comes to equity must come with clean hands. GEJ
seems to me a bad advertisement of the product he wants to sell. How
would you describe the pardon granted Alamieyeseigha? Is that not
rewarding corruption?”
A Facebook user, Prince Oyelola Timothy-Adesanya, argued that since
the President inadvertently gave a pass mark to his former boss, who was
indicted for corruption by a competent court, he was not morally fit to
lecture other Nigerians on the need to shun corrupt individuals.
“Hello Mr. President, it seems you don’t know who stands on the
wheel chair of corruption. The case study is Alamieyeseigha and the
public fund of Bayelsa State. Don’t forget your office gave him a pass
mark for the wrong doing? Oga Jonathan, who is deceiving who?”
Timothy-Adesanya said.
Another respondent on nairaland.com, Batman, noted that since the
President encouraged corruption through his actions, he was not in a
vantage position to cry foul.
Batman wrote, “He (Jonathan) encourages corruption. So what do you
expect everyone under him to do? Why is he the leader? Doesn’t he know
he is the number one person that should serve as an example? A body
always goes where the head tells it to go.
“The moment he (Jonathan) stops waving and smiling sheepishly and
takes a tough stance against corruption in high places, see if the chain
reaction won’t transmit to the grassroots.”
But, just as Jonathan urged Nigerians to “frown on people who come up
with what they are not supposed to have” with a view to checking
corruption, a Facebook user, Bam Olugbenga-Odugbesan, asked, “When your
mother (Eunice), a dependant for that matter, donates multimillion naira
block of hostels to the Federal University, Otuoke, Bayelsa State and
you applaud her without asking where she got the money from, is that not
corruption?’’
Meanwhile, Jonathan was also rebuked for stating that he would not
reveal the identities of those engaged in corrupt practices in both the
private and public sectors citing concerns that he could be “attacked.”
The statement was described by many people as the President’s own way of admitting that he is afraid of fighting corruption.
They hinged their argument on the fact that since he has the state
apparatus at his disposal, he should not hesitate to wield such powers
rather than express the fear of being “attacked.”
“Jonathan, you are the number one citizen of Nigeria and the
Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces. Are you scared of some
individuals and groups in the public and private sectors?
“If you can’t mention their names and punish them, then you are
encouraging them with a pat on the back,’’ another Nigerian, Okafor
Nolly, said on Facebook.
One Abiodun Johnson also noted, “He doesn’t have to name names. He
could easily arrest and prosecute them. But he is afraid of being
attacked! Nigeria is in trouble.’’
However, one Tony Are on punchng.com disagreed with Nolly saying, “If
the President should mention names. Many of us will say he is attacking
his enemies because of his 2015 ambition. Now he is saying nothing and
you still call him names.” -Punch